http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/01/18/linux-conf-au-2010-day-1-morning/ a potpourri of mirth and madness Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:06:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/01/18/linux-conf-au-2010-day-1-morning/#comment-2580 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:42:56 +0000 http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=862#comment-2580 [...] linux.conf.au 2010: Day 1 (morning) The theme for my morning, on the first day of the conference, was version control. The conference day was divided into mini-confs covering different topic areas, but this was a common theme of the sessions I attended in different mini-confs. [...]

]]> http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/01/18/linux-conf-au-2010-day-1-morning/#comment-2578 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:33:45 +0000 http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=862#comment-2578 Yes. This means that a DAG can’t be fully represented as a sequence. There are also differences which apply to the implementations rather than the model: for example, it’s generally straightforward to remove a patch from a patch sequence, but difficult or impossible to remove something from a revision control system’s DAG

]]> http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/01/18/linux-conf-au-2010-day-1-morning/#comment-2568 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:53:20 +0000 http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=862#comment-2568 Isn’t a DAG a superset of a sequence?

]]>