<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working from home: inbox focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/</link>
	<description>a potpourri of mirth and madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdz</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thesis seems to be &quot;the more hours you put in, the more successful you will be&quot;.

No, I think that&#039;s utter nonsense.  Working longer hours leads to fatigue and mistakes, which result in lower overall productivity.  This has been measured objectively in a variety of industries, including knowledge work.

I&#039;m not going to dig up proper references right now, but here are a few random links from Google to get you started: http://www.igda.org/articles/erobinson_crunch.php http://a-little-time.blogspot.com/2007/08/longer-hours-work-vs-productivity.html http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/5190.html

Intuitively, we all know that we get more done in less time when we are at our best, than when we force ourselves to keep going beyond our natural limits.  We&#039;ve all experienced those golden hours in &quot;the zone&quot; when productivity is multiplied.  We should look for ways to access our most productive states, rather than cramming more hours into the day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thesis seems to be &#8220;the more hours you put in, the more successful you will be&#8221;.</p>
<p>No, I think that&#8217;s utter nonsense.  Working longer hours leads to fatigue and mistakes, which result in lower overall productivity.  This has been measured objectively in a variety of industries, including knowledge work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to dig up proper references right now, but here are a few random links from Google to get you started: <a href="http://www.igda.org/articles/erobinson_crunch.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.igda.org/articles/erobinson_crunch.php</a> <a href="http://a-little-time.blogspot.com/2007/08/longer-hours-work-vs-productivity.html" rel="nofollow">http://a-little-time.blogspot.com/2007/08/longer-hours-work-vs-productivity.html</a> <a href="http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/5190.html" rel="nofollow">http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/5190.html</a></p>
<p>Intuitively, we all know that we get more done in less time when we are at our best, than when we force ourselves to keep going beyond our natural limits.  We&#8217;ve all experienced those golden hours in &#8220;the zone&#8221; when productivity is multiplied.  We should look for ways to access our most productive states, rather than cramming more hours into the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pool</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Pool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also: I see there&#039;s an autogenerated link to http://liverpoolchamber.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/there-is-no-substitute-for-hard-honest-work/ -- do you agree?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also: I see there&#8217;s an autogenerated link to <a href="http://liverpoolchamber.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/there-is-no-substitute-for-hard-honest-work/" rel="nofollow">http://liverpoolchamber.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/there-is-no-substitute-for-hard-honest-work/</a> &#8212; do you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pool</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Pool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another interesting post, thanks.

I&#039;m chewing on a different but somewhat similar problem: during work time, I often open my mailbox to refer to something sent previously, but it&#039;s very easy to notice other mails, either newer or ones matching the same search, and have them intrude on what I was originally thinking about.  Possibly this can be fixed entirely in my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting post, thanks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m chewing on a different but somewhat similar problem: during work time, I often open my mailbox to refer to something sent previously, but it&#8217;s very easy to notice other mails, either newer or ones matching the same search, and have them intrude on what I was originally thinking about.  Possibly this can be fixed entirely in my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdz</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why wouldn&#039;t I want to hear it?  Because I&#039;m a command line junkie? ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t I want to hear it?  Because I&#8217;m a command line junkie? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably don&#039;t want to hear this, but KDE4 can be configured to be context aware(of course, it is KDE after all :). 
It is not 100% yet, because not all KDE apps use it at the moment, but it is a good solution to the work/private problem.
Maybe Gnome3 should get something similar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably don&#8217;t want to hear this, but KDE4 can be configured to be context aware(of course, it is KDE after all :).<br />
It is not 100% yet, because not all KDE apps use it at the moment, but it is a good solution to the work/private problem.<br />
Maybe Gnome3 should get something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg's status on Tuesday, 30-Jun-09 16:00:00 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greg's status on Tuesday, 30-Jun-09 16:00:00 UTC - Identi.ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=429#comment-1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mutt rocks, you can make it do anything, including keeping you focused: http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mutt rocks, you can make it do anything, including keeping you focused: <a href="http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/" rel="nofollow">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/06/30/working-from-home-inbox-focus/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

