<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 9.04 does not use ext4 by default</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/</link>
	<description>a potpourri of mirth and madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorph33</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zorph33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-2524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job! It may be helpful in the process of studying ubuntu so I&#039;ve scrape it using scrapebook(firefox addon). Can you recommend any books about ubuntu for me? yeah, I am a noob of ubuntu. :D thanks in advance!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job! It may be helpful in the process of studying ubuntu so I&#8217;ve scrape it using scrapebook(firefox addon). Can you recommend any books about ubuntu for me? yeah, I am a noob of ubuntu. :D thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-1933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for the historical record (and because this post still gets traffic), Ubuntu 9.10 will ship with ext4 by default.  This is already the case in the beta released last week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the historical record (and because this post still gets traffic), Ubuntu 9.10 will ship with ext4 by default.  This is already the case in the beta released last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: May 1st, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: May 1st, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 06:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I wonder if btrfs will overrun ext4 before it&#8217;s even widely deployed. &#8220;Ubuntu 9.04 does not use ext4 by default&#8221; http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ub&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wonder if btrfs will overrun ext4 before it&#8217;s even widely deployed. &#8220;Ubuntu 9.04 does not use ext4 by default&#8221; <a href="http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ub&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ub&#038;#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenz</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the info Mackenzie, I have to confess, I didn&#039;t inform myself very well then, I thought it&#039;s free of bigger bugs. But it&#039;s ok, I have my important documents on Dropbox and the movies/music I back up regularly to an external HD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Mackenzie, I have to confess, I didn&#8217;t inform myself very well then, I thought it&#8217;s free of bigger bugs. But it&#8217;s ok, I have my important documents on Dropbox and the movies/music I back up regularly to an external HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackenzie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorenz:
The patch for the most common problem was backported.  There are still other possible issues in existence.

I&#039;m using ext4 for / and keeping /home on ext3.  And I carry around a live cd in case ext4 eats itself :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorenz:<br />
The patch for the most common problem was backported.  There are still other possible issues in existence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using ext4 for / and keeping /home on ext3.  And I carry around a live cd in case ext4 eats itself :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdz</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We included it because many people are willing to accept the tradeoffs, because they&#039;re interested in trying out the latest technology.

ext4 wasn&#039;t mentioned in the press release or release announcement, though we did include an item in the technical overview at http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904overview#Ext4%20filesystem%20support

The text there provides a pretty clear explanation of the risks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We included it because many people are willing to accept the tradeoffs, because they&#8217;re interested in trying out the latest technology.</p>
<p>ext4 wasn&#8217;t mentioned in the press release or release announcement, though we did include an item in the technical overview at <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904overview#Ext4%20filesystem%20support" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904overview#Ext4%20filesystem%20support</a></p>
<p>The text there provides a pretty clear explanation of the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenz</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so the bug still exists? I thought it has been sorted out. I run ext4 now and the perceived speed increase is around 100%! Start Up time seems halfed, overall responsiveness of the system feels much better...loving it so far, no data lost either (hopefully)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the bug still exists? I thought it has been sorted out. I run ext4 now and the perceived speed increase is around 100%! Start Up time seems halfed, overall responsiveness of the system feels much better&#8230;loving it so far, no data lost either (hopefully)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[André Oliveira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s completely understandable, it&#039;s a new technology, its put there mainly for those who like to be a bit more &quot;bleeding edge&quot;. Tho Intrepid and Jaunty ext3 are defaulted to size 256 inodes while before they used to be 128. It&#039;s pretty much installed following the ext4 standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s completely understandable, it&#8217;s a new technology, its put there mainly for those who like to be a bit more &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221;. Tho Intrepid and Jaunty ext3 are defaulted to size 256 inodes while before they used to be 128. It&#8217;s pretty much installed following the ext4 standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evildead</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evildead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why put the Ext4 support as an highlight in this release then? It&#039;s like showing a candy to a kid and saying &quot;No, don&#039;t touch this&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why put the Ext4 support as an highlight in this release then? It&#8217;s like showing a candy to a kid and saying &#8220;No, don&#8217;t touch this&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2009/05/01/ubuntu-904-does-not-use-ext4-by-default/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdzlog.alcor.net/?p=345#comment-640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could you also tell us what those bugs with ext4 are ? 
What are the risks?
Thanks,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you also tell us what those bugs with ext4 are ?<br />
What are the risks?<br />
Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

